| Author |
|
rishi_somshetti
Groupie
Joined: 31 January 2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 84
|
| Posted: 20 January 2008 at 7:12am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Jan 20, 2008
We were looking at RFC 4870 for implementing DomainKeys. As per the document signing and verifying can effectively occur anywhere from the border MTA right back to the Mail User Agent (MUA).
If domainkeys becomes part of the MailBee MessageQueue it will have a lot of advantage as it can relay mails directly instead of relying on slow/overloaded/legacy mail servers.
There are other components like http://www.emailarchitect.net/ in the market. With this feature MailBee can become more competative as this is an important feature.
Rishi
Rishi
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Andrew
AfterLogic Support
Joined: 28 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1189
|
| Posted: 21 January 2008 at 5:06am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Thank you for the suggestion.
Best regards,
Andrew
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
rishi_somshetti
Groupie
Joined: 31 January 2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 84
|
| Posted: 21 January 2008 at 7:44am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Jan 21, 2008
Andrew,
We are planning to implement this in our solution. In case if you plan to implement Domainkeys can you please let us know if you have any timeframe for implementation?
The code is ready available on Internet so I don't thing this would take time.
Rishi
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Alex
AfterLogic Support
Joined: 19 November 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2206
|
| Posted: 21 January 2008 at 8:26am | IP Logged
|
|
|
We do not have any timeframe assigned for this feature yet so I don't think it will be implemented in the near future.
Regards,
Alex
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
rishi_somshetti
Groupie
Joined: 31 January 2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 84
|
| Posted: 21 January 2008 at 9:02am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Jan 21, 2008
Is it possible that you implement this for us. We will pay for it. Anyway we have to have it in our application.
Rishi
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Alex
AfterLogic Support
Joined: 19 November 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2206
|
| Posted: 22 January 2008 at 7:31am | IP Logged
|
|
|
It's possible but it won't be a quick fix. It's quite a lot of C++ work (probably, months) to implement domain keys and especially direct send in MMQ.
Actually, it would be faster to re-write MMQ in C# and use direct send capability of MailBee.NET Objects.
Regards,
Alx
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
raindm
Groupie
Joined: 31 January 2008
Location: Israel
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 44
|
| Posted: 16 May 2008 at 3:46am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hi Alex,
You said it would be faster to re-write MMQ in c# and use direct send capability.
Do you have an example of how to implement domain key with direct send in c# using MMQ?
Actually i dont know what is MMQ and what do you mean by - "re-write"?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Alex
AfterLogic Support
Joined: 19 November 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2206
|
| Posted: 16 May 2008 at 7:44am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Quote:
| Do you have an example of how to implement domain key with direct send in c# using MMQ? |
|
|
No example is available yet. Domain keys is a complex technology, we plan to add support of it in future versions of MailBee.NET Objects.
Quote:
Actually i dont know what is MMQ and what do you mean by - "re-write"?
|
|
|
MMQ is MailBee Message Queue. In the future, we'll release native .NET version of this system which will support domain keys.
Regards,
Alex
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
MailBee.NET Objects 
MailBee.NET Queue 
MailBee Objects 
WebMail Pro PHP 
AfterLogic Aurora 
MailSuite Pro for Linux 
Unified Messaging Solution 
Search
Register
Login
Topic: domain keys
Privacy policy |
Refund policy