Search The ForumSearch   RegisterRegister  LoginLogin

AfterLogic WebMail Lite
 AfterLogic Forum : AfterLogic WebMail Lite
Subject Topic: How to enable SSL connection? Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Maikl
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 19 August 2011
Location: Austria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Posted: 06 July 2018 at 7:03am | IP Logged Quote Maikl
Hi,

I tried to change the TCP/IP ports for IMAP an my hMailserver to secure the connection, but I can't login with WebMail Lite (ASP.Net) anymore - which settings are necessary, and how can I configure WebMail Lite to use a secure connection?


hMailserver (Settings >> Advanced >> TCP/IP-Ports):

Protocol: IMAP
TCP/IP address: 0.0.0.0
Port: 143
Connection security: possible values are "None" (which works, but which I will get rid of), "STARTTLS (optional)", "STARTTLS (required)" and "SSL/TLS".

Thanks for helping
Michael

Back to Top View Maikl's Profile Search for other posts by Maikl Visit Maikl's Homepage
 
Igor
AfterLogic Support
AfterLogic Support


Joined: 24 June 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6038
Posted: 06 July 2018 at 7:06am | IP Logged Quote Igor
Try using port 993, it's a typical port for SSL-enabled access over IMAP protocol. Make sure it's enabled on hMailServer as well.

--
Regards,
Igor, Afterlogic Support
Back to Top View Igor's Profile Search for other posts by Igor
 
Maikl
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 19 August 2011
Location: Austria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Posted: 07 July 2018 at 1:12am | IP Logged Quote Maikl
Igor,

thanks for the reply. I tried that, but still it does not work. Here is the error log from WebMail Lite:


[10:03:29.56] [INFO] Assembly version: 6.0.2.220.
[10:03:29.56] [INFO] Will resolve host "localhost".
[10:03:29.57] [INFO] Host "localhost" resolved to IP address(es) 127.0.0.1.
[10:03:29.57] [INFO] Will connect to host "localhost" on port 143.
[10:03:30.57] [INFO] Error: Socket connection has been refused by remote host. InnerException message follows: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it 127.0.0.1:143

There are two things that I don't understand:


1) I changed the mail server name in the admin panel from localhost to the server name on the issued certificate, so I don't wonder that this is not working as it tries to connect to "localhost". But where can I change this behaviour?

2) Where can I define the port to connect to? It still tries to connect to 143.

Thanks!
Michael
Back to Top View Maikl's Profile Search for other posts by Maikl Visit Maikl's Homepage
 
Igor
AfterLogic Support
AfterLogic Support


Joined: 24 June 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6038
Posted: 09 July 2018 at 12:50am | IP Logged Quote Igor
Default mailserver connection settings are adjusted in Domains section of AdminPanel as shown here. Adjusting default settings will not affect existing accounts, you need to delete the account and have it recreated.

Bear in mind that WebMail Lite .NET is discontinued, using PHP version is strongly advised.

--
Regards,
Igor, Afterlogic Support
Back to Top View Igor's Profile Search for other posts by Igor
 
Maikl
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 19 August 2011
Location: Austria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Posted: 15 July 2018 at 12:17am | IP Logged Quote Maikl
Igor wrote:
[…] Bear in mind that WebMail Lite .NET is discontinued, using PHP version is strongly advised.


This is really bad news. I used Squirrel Mail for a while, but I did not like to have PHP installed on my server only to have a web mail service.


Please re-think that decision.


Best wishes
Michael

Back to Top View Maikl's Profile Search for other posts by Maikl Visit Maikl's Homepage
 
Alex
AfterLogic Support
AfterLogic Support
Avatar

Joined: 19 November 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2206
Posted: 15 July 2018 at 1:54am | IP Logged Quote Alex
We have no resources to develop .NET version on our own but it would be possible in terms of sponsored development. If you're interested, please contact us via Helpdesk to discuss this in more detail.

Regards,
Alex
Back to Top View Alex's Profile Search for other posts by Alex
 
Maikl
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 19 August 2011
Location: Austria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Posted: 15 July 2018 at 2:07am | IP Logged Quote Maikl
Alex,

thanks for the answer. Why not releasing the .Net version on GitHub (as you already did with the PHP Version)? I am sure that you will find people from the community who will improve it, and your commercial product could benefit from that step as well.

Best wishes
Michael
Back to Top View Maikl's Profile Search for other posts by Maikl Visit Maikl's Homepage
 
Alex
AfterLogic Support
AfterLogic Support
Avatar

Joined: 19 November 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2206
Posted: 16 July 2018 at 1:33am | IP Logged Quote Alex
Hi,

Too many roadblocks to this. Just to name a few:
- Unlike PHP version, ASP.NET Lite version is not open-source as it included some closed-source components. Actually, this is the most important one.
- Commercial version won't benefit at all because it uses different codebase, they don't share the common codebase like it's done for PHP version.
- No outsiders actually tend to participate in development (we've seen this in PHP version which's been on Github from the start), so Github acts just as a place to take the sources from. But people can get the sources from our web site anyway.

Regards,
Alex
Back to Top View Alex's Profile Search for other posts by Alex
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version 7.9
Copyright ©2001-2004 Web Wiz Guide